Bush hopes to reassure nation after economic woes
October 10, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Posted in Business News, U.S.News | 1 CommentTags: WASHINGTON
President Bush will discuss the economy Friday morning in the White House Rose Garden.
Since September 15, the day financial giant Lehman Brothers failed, the president has commented on the nation’s financial health 26 times, either through written, radio or on-camera statements.
White House Press Secretary Dana Perino says the president will let Americans know they “should be confident that every effort is being taken to stabilize our financial system.”
Perino announced the news after Thursday’s astonishing 679-point drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, saying Bush would make his remarks “following the market’s continued volatility this afternoon.”
Watch CNN’s Ali Velshi discuss Thursday’s massive stock sell-off »
Perino also said Bush’s speech at the White House Rose Garden is not expected to announce any policy decisions. In the past, Bush’s statements have mostly been brief, as in Thursday’s comments at the White House during a Hispanic Heritage Month celebration.
“I’m confident in our economy’s long-term prospects. We’ll get through this deal,” he said.
Yet with world markets already rattled over the U.S.’s financial woes, Bush and his advisers have seemingly concluded the only way to express that confidence is in short, measured statements. While the president did deliver a primetime address to the nation last month focusing on the financial crisis, he has not held a formal news conference since July 15.
Don’t Miss
In fact, the last time the president took questions on the economy, the inquiries came not from reporters, but from small business owners in suburban Washington on Tuesday. The questions were polite but pointed.
After listening to the president deliver remarks, business leaders asked him how to cope with frozen credit markets. His answers reflected the delicate balance between reassurance and reality.
“I believe the steps we’re taking will free up the credit. It took a while to get it frozen; it’s going to take a while to get it unstuck,” Bush said, as he defended the massive $700 billion financial rescue plan passed last week. “In the meantime, have faith that this economy is going to recover over time.”
Answering another question about what might happen to one man’s 401(k) and others’ retirement plans, the president was both positive and blunt.
“I think in the long run, they’re going to be fine because the stock markets will reflect real value. In the short term, they’re going to take a hit,” he said.
Yet analyst Anne Mathias with the Stanford Group says for Bush, trying to reassure Americans and the markets is problematic on several levels.
“The first part is that he’s really not very popular right now … The second part is that he is not very fluent in discussing these kinds of issues,” Mathias said, adding, “it’s a really dicey question because the markets are so reactive that if you say the wrong thing it’s easy to make the problem much worse.”
Mathias says the third difficulty for Bush is credibility. “There are many who oppose him or are upset with the White House who put the blame for us being in this position at his feet,” she said. “It’s difficult to be a credible part of the solution when many people think you are part of the problem.”
In the latest CNN Opinion Research Corp. poll, 26 percent of Americans expressed confidence in the president’s ability to handle the financial crisis, compared with 52 percent for Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who has been President Bush’s point man on the crisis.
Deputy White House Press Secretary Tony Fratto called it a “bizarre notion” that some believe Secretary Paulson acts independently of the president, saying the secretary “works at the direction of the president.”
Fratto also rejected the notion that the Bush administration is to blame for the crisis, saying for years, the administration had been calling for more oversight of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
“We’ve been pushing for 6 years to put a strong regulator in place to get those companies to clean up their acts,” Fratto said. “Some of the policies we asked for took a lot longer than necessary.”
He said Bush showed tremendous leadership in pushing financial rescue legislation, formally called the “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act,” through the Congress.
“We did something in a matter of days that had never been done before,” Fratto said. He added that considering the complex and historic nature of the bill and election-year politics, “it’s a remarkable accomplishment.”
Yet Mathias says the bill’s passage probably had more to do with the credit freeze affecting the broader economy.
“All of a sudden, the switchboards lit up on Capitol Hill with people saying, ‘Whoa, I can’t get my loan. My line of credit got canceled. My home equity line just got canceled, you’ve got to do something,’ and I don’t think that is necessarily political leadership on the part of anybody in Congress or in the White House … It was more like desperation caused this bill to get passed,” Mathias said.
It was one week ago that Bush signed the bill into law, and the Dow has steadily dropped in the days since. A senior administration official who asked not to be named ahead of the president’s Rose Garden remarks said, “Look, anyone who tries to make the case that this (market volatility) is some grade on the rescue plan needs to have patience. We haven’t even bought a single asset yet,” referring to the Treasury Department’s new authority to buy troubled assets from banks.
Mathias likened the situation to going to the doctor’s office. “You go to the doctor’s office, you get a prescription, it doesn’t start working right away, and that is the case with this bill. President Bush signed it, but nothing has actually happened yet,” Mathias said, adding, “I think once this actually starts working, once the patient starts taking the medicine, people will start to feel better.”
Until then, Bush is in a sense, stalling, swerving and solving. He’s stalling by continually explaining that the government has an arsenal of tools available to deal with the financial crisis. He’s swerving to avoid market-sensitive statements, such as commenting on specific policy options. He’s solving, as in his calls to world leaders this week to coordinate their actions as well as an upcoming Saturday meeting at the White House with the finance ministers of the Group of Seven industrialized countries.
Watch how U.S. allies are playing the “blame game” »

Friday will mark the 27th time Bush will have commented on the crisis since it first emerged into public view with the collapse of Lehman Brothers in August. The backdrop is different than 26 days ago. This time, amid fears of a global recession, Bush will try to present a clear-eyed, yet reassuring case for why Americans and investors around the world should stop worrying.
However, with less than four months left in office, the president also has to wonder whether anyone is listening.
Ref :: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/10/bush.balancing.act/index.html
BCE buyout wins unanimous ruling
June 21, 2008 at 3:18 am | Posted in Business News | Leave a commentTags: BCE, BCE buyout wins unanimous ruling, BCE Inc., Business, Business News, Canada, Canada's, News, Ontario, TORONTO
TORONTO, Ontario (AP) – BCE Inc. on Friday won the right to go ahead with the largest leveraged buyout in history, a US$35 billion deal that the telecommunications company’s bondholders fought, saying it would reduce their holdings to junk.
Canada’s Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling that the sale of BCE, the parent of telecommunications holding company Bell Canada, to the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan and its minority U.S. partners didn’t adequately consider bondholders’ interests.
The court’s rationale for its unanimous decision is to be released later.
“We’re pleased with the Supreme Court’s decision and we’re continuing to work to complete an acquisition of BCE,” Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan spokeswoman Deborah Allan said.
The last hurdle to the deal also looks to be gone, as the banks said they would proceed with the deal. The banks are slated to provide US$33 billion in financing to complete what is a US$51 billion cash and debt takeover.
Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland and Toronto-Dominion Bank, the four banks that have committed to financing the debt portion of deal, issued a statement saying they expect the transaction will close “in accordance with the Definitive Agreement between BCE and the sponsors. We continue to negotiate the financing documents in good faith with the sponsors and stand behind our original commitment to the transaction.”
A leveraged buyout is an acquisition of a company using a significant amount of borrowed money to meet the cost of acquisition. Many takeovers do not involve significant debt.
BCE said it has received final approval from Canada’s telecommunications regulator and expects final government backing next week. The telecom company said it hopes the sale will close in the third quarter which ends September 30.
“Today’s unanimous decision by the Supreme Court affirms BCE’s long standing position that the plan of arrangement complies with the rights and reasonable expectations of Bell Canada debentureholders,” said Richard Currie, chairman of BCE and Bell Canada.
“With this decision by the Supreme Court and the confirmation of regulatory approvals, we are now in a good position to complete the transaction. “We expect all parties to the transaction will honor their commitments.”
Shares of BCE traded up more than nine percent to US$37.29 in after-hours trading.
BCE lawyer Guy Du Pont argued that BCE’s board had a duty only to do what is best for the company and its shareholders and their obligation to bondholders was to meet contractual obligations to pay interest and repay principal.
The bondholders claimed that saddling BCE with an additional US$33 billion in debt reduced their holdings to junk bond status and would cost them more than US$1 billion.
The Supreme Court was asked to decide what interests a board should consider when a takeover takes place. The lower court, a Quebec appeals court, found that BCE did not fairly consider the interests of bondholders.
The ruling came as a surprise because directors usually only consider the rights of shareholders when making a deal.
Elliott Soifer, vice president of Desjardins Securities International, said the Supreme Court’s decision is very positive for the Canadian market.
“We’re very relieved because this is the way that we always understood the capital markets work, and the Supreme Court has clarified that. This is one of the most important decisions that’s ever come out of the Supreme Court with regard to corporate law,” Soifer said.
Anita Anand, law professor at the University of Toronto, called it a landmark decision for stakeholders in Canadian companies.
Shareholders overwhelmingly approved the buyout group’s offer of C$42.75 ($42.67) per share in September.
The deal, which is also the biggest takeover of any kind in Canadian history, was agreed to in June 2007, just before credit markets began to unravel in North America.
After June 30, 2008, the buyers would be entitled to walk away from the deal. BCE is also known as Bell Canada.
BCE shares have been trading well below C$42.75 for months, on fears that the deal would not be completed.
The Toronto-based Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan — with assets of C$108 billion (US$106 billion) in 2007 — invests and administers the retirement funds for Ontario’s 353,000 active, inactive, and retired teachers. U.S.-based Providence Equity Partners and Madison Dearborn Partners LLC are also involved in the proposed buyout.
BCE, which has more than 54,000 employees, had annual revenue of C$17.8 billion (US$17.5 billion) in 2007. It had 5.8 million wireless subscribers, 8.64 million phone lines, 1.94 million Internet subscribers and 1.82 million satellite television subscribers in 2006.
Bell Canada and its proposed new CEO George Cope are expected to refocus the Montreal telecom operator, as it faces more intense competition in its wireless and Internet data businesses.
Industry analysts also expect Bell to intensify efforts to compete more aggressively with Canadian cable TV operators such as Rogers Communications, Videotron and Shaw, which have been taking data, landline and other telecom business away from Bell in recent years.
Ref :: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/06/20/canada.bce.ap/index.html
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.